what is your political ideology every one of us has an ?

So. The POTUS basically said "I can change the 14th Amendment with an EO if I choose. Or a simple majority. Legal experts, smart ones, good ones, told me so." One. I repeat ONE R in Congress said "No you cant Donald.". And it was Ryan on his way out this week. If Congress is a "check" on him, why are the silent? Afraid they will lose their seat if they do their job instead of keeping silent?

 

So. Lets test the No Gun Control. Should felons have guns? If not, please show me the line in the Amendment, not "personal beliefs", that allows that. Now, if we let that regulation in? Why are others banned. That is one that is NOT in the Amendment proper.

 

Your response doesn't seem to have anything to do with Dane211 or pussycat's posts. Can you explain why them wanting a Candidate that doesn't want to create more Gun Control Laws have to do with whether or not it's in an Amendment.

 

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

This seems to be the particular item in question. The point being made is that the President cannot change an Amendment by Executive Order. But the President can interpret the meaning and implementation by Executive Order. The phrase " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" will probably be the focus of The Executive Order. I believe that it will state that since the Parents are here illegally, they are not acting as if they are subject to our jurisdiction and anything they do is done while not subject to our jurisdiction, including giving birth, therefore the anyone born here of Illegal Alien Parents need not be given Birthright Citizenship. No, Trump cannot stop Birthright Citizenship in the 14th Amendment by Executive Order, but he can interpret the definition of the 14th Amendment to exclude children born of illegal immigrant parents. Of course this would definitely go to the Supreme Court to see how it stands Constitutionally, but he is not trying to change the Constitution just interpret it in a more precise manner.

On a side note, this is exactly the same way that the Democrats are trying to change the 1st, 2nd and a few other Amendments. They are being hypocrites arguing against it. The fact that they have tried to do it themselves have come back to slap them in the face. Turn about is fair play.

 

Hof was originally a Democrat, but became disillusioned with the Party during the Obama years. He then transitioned to the Libertarian Party and finally to the Republican Party in 2016. Its interesting to note that the people hated Democrats so much that they wanted a dead Republican over a live Democrat.